@jbtaylor on tech

I'm a spokesman for Sprint. This personal site is where I share news stories and my views about our company, our phones and other devices. I also write a bit about tech policy, the wireless industry and life in Washington, D.C.

To ensure that Sprint's lawyers continue to support employees' use of social media, please read the disclaimers on my "About this Posterous" page.

Fast Company on Popularity, Ego, and Influence

Media_httpimagesfastc_rbiss

This morning, Fast Company's Mark Borden, the editor who's heading up the magazine's Influence Project, responded to critics:

"In roughly 24 hours, nearly 6,000 people have registered to participate in an experiment we started called The Influence Project. It's been written about by TechCrunch, The Huffington Post, The New York Times, and a score of personal blogs."

He continues:

"We've created a platform where anyone can see what happens to his or her social network when people are asked to take an action. The scoring is based partly on how many people click on the link to your profile, and partly on a bonus awarded to people who get others inside their network to sign up and take part. (Someone with 100,000 followers who only gets 100 people to join the project is less influential than someone with 150 followers who gets 100 people to join.) We didn’t give guidance on how people should pursue their influence goals. Some people may engage in deception to get others to click on their link (hello 4Chan), some may use tactics that feel like spam to boost their results (hello, SEO consultants). Some may want to use charity as a lever to push engagement--go ahead, we won't stop you. Is that inappropriate? Is that unfair? Is that a popularity contest? Maybe. But it's also reflective of behavior that happens on the internet everyday."

That last bit -- that the project is reflective of Internet behavior -- sounds about right to me. While I agree with this critic, who said the Fast Company experiment was confusing ego with influence, so much of what the Internet is about, particularly for businesses, does precisely that.

As for me, my own prediction -- that I'm more influential offline than on the Net -- has ended up being exactly right. I've been unable to influence a single person to sign up for the project. (On the other hand, if past experience is any guide, several hundred people will read this blog post within an hour after I post it.)

I'll make another prediction, this upcoming story, will be highly read, especially by those who loathe what my friend Daria Steigman calls "click on my junk" Internet behavior.

Fast Company Asks: Who's the Most Influential Person Online?

Media_httpinfluencepr_puhfm

Fast Company's cover story for its November 2010 issue ought to be interesting. The magazine has launched a search to discover the most influential person online. Dubbed the Influence Project, the magazine is capturing the social graphs of readers who enter a short bio and upload a photo. Whoever influences the most people to join the experiment is deemed the most influential. (Oh and the more influential you are, the bigger your photo gets on Fast Company's Influence Project site. And your photo could be included in a cover illustration.) Mark Borden, the Fast Company editor heading up the project explains:

What the Influence Project aims to do is remove some of the mystery behind the inherent passivity of social network numbers. This experiment will show what happens when an individual takes an audience at rest and applies an unbalanced force--through suggestion, advice or direction--that converts it into an army of action. That's power that can be quantified and lead to an understanding that can be applied to both the largest and smallest of networks. No doubt it's profound to address a million followers and get 100,000 of them to respond. But what does it mean when you have one hundred friends on Facebook and 97 of them click through to a site on your recommendation?

I don't know if I'd call this person influential, but I do think this project will help tell you a bit more about what Facebook calls your social graph. Businesses should learn a lot about social networking from this story and Fast Company will rake in tons of valuable data about its readers -- for free, mind you. Each person who enters is given a unique URL. Here's mine. If you click on it, supposedly, I'm considered just a bit more influential than the next person on Facebook, Twitter or Foursquare. If you ask me this little experiment is open to mischief, but I'm vain enough, narcissistic enough, curious enough to play.

What about you? Are you more influential online or off-line?