@jbtaylor on tech

On the eve of a bipartisan compromise to extend a middle class tax cut and continue unemployment benefits for our friends and neighbors out of work, Politico described AT&T's lobbyists as, "furious" that Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress didn't adopt everything the company wanted in the legislation.

Remember, with AT&T, it's always "my way or the highway" when it comes to public policy.

Missing from what DSL Reports' Karl Bode called a "pout festival" was like-minded Twin Bell Verizon. I'm guessing that top Verizon lobbyist, former Iowa GOP Congressman Tom Tauke and his team realized what Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) said about the compromise over the bill's spectrum provisions was true:

“Did we get every single thing that we wanted? No. No one ever has and I don’t think they ever will, including my children.”

Perhaps AT&T's top lobbyist Jim Cicconi believes that too, but in a statement to media yesterday, he pointed out that there is "an opportunity for a court challenge" if the FCC doesn't give his company all the spectrum it wants.

Lovely.

Before the FCC even opens a docket about the future wireless spectrum auction, AT&T is already threatening a lawsuit if it doesn't get its way.

That sounds like an empty threat to me. The last time AT&T was in court over an effort to obtain more spectrum was when the U.S. Department of Justice and a bi-partisan group of state Attorneys General sued the company over its proposed takeover of T-Mobile.

We all know what happened then.

Rather than fight the government in court, AT&T chose to leave the courtroom and abandon the transaction, rather than stand by its scorched earth rhetoric.

So yesterday's threat from AT&T sounds like more empty saber rattling to me.

Time will tell.

p.s. Once again, please remember that this is my personal blog and may not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.

Congressional negotiators announced this morning that a compromise had been reached regarding an extension of a payroll tax cut and unemployment benefits. The Members of Congress who brokered the compromise indicated the legislative compromise includes provisions regarding future wireless spectrum auctions to be conducted by the FCC, as well as provisions to help fund an interoperable public safety broadband network.

The following statement can be attributed to Vonya B. McCann, senior vice president for Government Affairs, Sprint:

“Sprint supports the bipartisan compromise announced this morning by the House and Senate leadership and we hope that Republicans and Democrats in both the House and Senate will support it with a vote for final passage.

Sprint agrees with the Federal Communications Commission that all wireless carriers – small, regional and large – should have a meaningful chance to participate in wireless spectrum auctions. While we didn’t see the need to amend the statute, the compromise language approved by the conferees preserves the FCC’s ability to promote competition as it conducts future wireless spectrum auctions.

“In addition, the legislation includes language which provides funding for construction of an interoperable public safety broadband network which will give our country’s first responders much needed financial resources to protect the communities they serve.

"Supporting the final passage of this compromise legislation will help drive the expansion of high speed mobile broadband across the country thereby encouraging innovation, stimulating our economy and better meeting the needs of wireless consumers."